The Multifaceted Nature of Shame: Psychological Origins, Societal Impact, and Pathways to Resilience

Abstract

Shame, a fundamental human emotion, profoundly influences individual well-being and interpersonal dynamics. This research report delves into the complex nature of shame, distinguishing it from related affective states like guilt and embarrassment, and exploring its developmental, neurobiological, and socio-cultural underpinnings. We examine how shame serves as a significant barrier to open communication, authenticity, and connection, contributing to silence and isolation across various contexts, including mental health, trauma, and addiction. Drawing on contemporary psychological research, the report illuminates effective strategies for identifying, processing, and ultimately transcending shame, emphasizing the crucial roles of self-compassion, vulnerability, and therapeutic interventions. Ultimately, this report advocates for a nuanced understanding of shame, recognizing its pervasive impact while simultaneously highlighting the potential for resilience and authentic self-acceptance through informed and compassionate approaches.

Many thanks to our sponsor Maggie who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

Emotion is an intricate tapestry woven into the fabric of human experience, guiding our perceptions, behaviors, and interactions. Among the most potent and often debilitating of these emotions is shame. Far from a mere fleeting discomfort, shame is an intensely painful self-conscious emotion characterized by a perception of global self-devaluation, a belief that one is fundamentally flawed and unworthy of love and belonging. It can manifest as feelings of inadequacy, worthlessness, and a powerful urge to hide or disappear. The pervasive nature of shame, often operating outside conscious awareness, makes it challenging to identify and address, yet its influence is profound, impacting psychological adjustment and interpersonal relationships.

While often conflated with similar affective states, differentiating shame from guilt and embarrassment is critical for a precise understanding of its impact. Guilt, unlike shame, typically focuses on a specific action or behavior, reflecting a feeling of remorse for ‘having done something bad.’ It is often associated with a desire to make amends and can motivate constructive change. In contrast, shame is about ‘being bad’ as a person, reflecting a perceived defect in one’s core self. Embarrassment, the lightest of these self-conscious emotions, usually arises from trivial social transgressions or a minor faux pas, often leading to temporary discomfort rather than a deep sense of self-condemnation. While embarrassment focuses on one’s self-presentation, shame involves the whole self and core identity. The distinct psychological mechanisms and behavioral outcomes associated with each emotion underscore the necessity of this differentiation for effective intervention and therapeutic practice.

This research report will explore the multifaceted nature of shame, from its origins in early development and neurobiological underpinnings to its insidious role in fostering silence and isolation across diverse human experiences. It will then pivot to a comprehensive examination of evidence-based strategies for identifying, processing, and overcoming shame, ultimately advocating for a compassionate and integrated approach to foster authenticity and self-acceptance. The insights presented herein are intended to be of interest to experts in the field, contributing to a more profound understanding of this powerful human emotion.

Many thanks to our sponsor Maggie who helped us prepare this research report.

2. The Psychodynamics and Neurobiology of Shame

The origins of shame are deeply rooted in early developmental experiences and the formation of the self. From a psychodynamic perspective, shame often emerges from early relational patterns where a child’s inherent need for connection and acceptance is met with criticism, neglect, or conditional regard. These experiences can lead to an internalized belief that one is inherently unacceptable or ‘not enough,’ forming the bedrock of chronic or ‘toxic’ shame. Unlike healthy shame, which serves as a moral compass guiding accountability and growth, toxic shame is a pervasive sense of unworthiness that can severely impact self-esteem and lead to self-loathing. It often stems from repeated negative evaluations from others, leading to a distorted sense of identity and an eagerness to hide perceived flaws. Healthy shame, on the other hand, is a normal, adaptive emotion that can motivate self-correction and a desire to make amends for specific actions.

Neurobiological research offers insights into the brain’s response to shame. Studies utilizing fMRI have identified key brain regions activated by shame, including the prefrontal cortex and the posterior insula. The prefrontal cortex, associated with moral reasoning, is involved in self-judgment, while the posterior insula appears to engage visceral sensations, possibly correlating with the common ‘pit in your stomach’ feeling associated with shame. When individuals experience shame, the brain can react as if it were in physical danger, activating the sympathetic nervous system and triggering a fight, flight, or freeze response. This physiological response, particularly the ‘flight’ or ‘freeze’ urge, aligns with the behavioral tendency to hide or withdraw observed in shame. The pregenual anterior cingulate cortex has also been implicated, with its size potentially influencing the intensity of shame experienced. Furthermore, some research suggests that shame, much like physical pain, may have evolved as a defense mechanism to prevent damage to social relationships and to motivate their repair. This evolutionary perspective posits that shame helps individuals factor in others’ regard to avoid social devaluation. Frontal, temporal, and limbic areas appear to play a prominent role in the generation of moral feelings, including shame and guilt, with some overlapping and some distinct neural networks for these emotions.

Moreover, chronic exposure to toxic shame during childhood can impact brain structures such as the hippocampus, which is responsible for memory consolidation, further entrenching the learned responses to shame. This intricate interplay between psychological development and neurobiological processes underscores the deep and often unconscious nature of shame’s hold on individuals.

Many thanks to our sponsor Maggie who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Shame as a Barrier to Connection and Authenticity

Shame, by its very nature, is a social emotion deeply intertwined with our desire for connection and belonging. Brené Brown’s foundational theory posits that the fear of losing connection inevitably leads to shame, defining it as ‘the intensely painful feeling or experience of believing that we are flawed and therefore unworthy of love and belonging’. This inherent fear of rejection fuels a powerful urge to hide and protect one’s true self, creating significant barriers to authenticity and genuine connection.

The impact of shame on communication and self-disclosure is profound. Individuals experiencing shame often withdraw from social interactions and avoid situations where they fear being overlooked or invalidated. This can lead to a pervasive sense of loneliness and isolation, as the individual feels disconnected from others and the world around them. The silence perpetuated by shame prevents open conversation, hindering the formation of bridges in relationships and instead building walls. When people believe they are ‘bad’ at their core, they struggle to express their needs and emotions, fearing they will not be heard or valued. This defensive posture, driven by the intense discomfort of shame, obstructs intimacy and fosters a cycle of self-protection that paradoxically leads to deeper isolation.

Shame’s detrimental effects are particularly evident in various sensitive contexts:

• Mental Health Stigma: Shame is a significant barrier to help-seeking for individuals struggling with mental health conditions. It is often described as the ’emotional consequence of the stigma of mental illness,’ leading to feelings of guilt, embarrassment, and distress. People with mental illness may anticipate experiencing stigma, leading them to withdraw from social situations and feel ‘less than’ or ‘unworthy’. This internal and external shame can prevent individuals from seeking the necessary professional support, perpetuating suffering in silence. Cultural values and beliefs can exacerbate these feelings, with men, for instance, reporting higher levels of shame related to mental health and a reluctance to seek help compared to women.

• Trauma and Abuse: Shame is a predominant emotion in the aftermath of interpersonal trauma, often more so than fear. Survivors may internalize the belief that they are inherently flawed or responsible for what happened, rather than recognizing that the perpetrator was unsafe. This self-blame, a manifestation of shame, can be deeply debilitating, affecting their sense of self, trust in others, and overall sense of safety in the world. Healing from trauma often requires addressing this ingrained shame, which thrives in secrecy and judgment.

• Addiction and Recovery: As highlighted in the initial context, shame is a primary barrier in addiction recovery. Individuals in recovery often carry immense shame related to their past behaviors, which can prevent them from engaging in open conversation and seeking connection within supportive communities. The fear of judgment and rejection can lead to hiding the truth of their struggles, undermining the vulnerability and honesty essential for sustainable recovery. Numbing emotions, including shame, through substance use can become a self-perpetuating cycle, preventing individuals from experiencing authentic emotions like love and connection.

• Marginalized Identities and Societal Shame: Shame is not solely an individual experience but is deeply embedded in societal norms and cultural expectations. Individuals from marginalized groups, whether due to ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, or socioeconomic status, may experience ‘external shame’ when they believe their identity or circumstances would lead to negative societal responses. Cultural values can significantly influence how shame is experienced and expressed, with some cultures being more ‘shame-centric’ than ‘guilt-centric’. This collective or societal shame can enforce conformity and contribute to the internalization of negative self-perceptions, impacting self-worth and perpetuating systemic inequalities.

In essence, shame fosters a painful sense of deficiency, defeat, and unworthiness, leading to withdrawal and hindering the very human need for social engagement and authentic relatedness. It is a powerful emotion that demands isolation, creating a paradox where the very need for connection is thwarted by the fear of exposure.

Many thanks to our sponsor Maggie who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Therapeutic Frameworks and Strategies for Processing Shame

Overcoming shame, especially the pervasive and debilitating ‘toxic shame,’ is a complex but achievable process that requires targeted therapeutic approaches and a cultivation of internal resources. A central tenet in modern shame-informed therapy is the understanding that while shame thrives in silence and secrecy, it cannot survive in an environment of empathy and shared vulnerability.

Several therapeutic modalities have demonstrated efficacy in addressing shame:

• Self-Compassion-Focused Therapies: Perhaps one of the most powerful antidotes to shame is self-compassion. Self-compassion involves treating oneself with kindness, understanding, and non-judgment, particularly in moments of pain, struggle, or perceived inadequacy. This approach encourages individuals to acknowledge their mistakes with kindness rather than self-criticism, which helps to mitigate the detrimental impacts of chronic shame and supports emotional regulation. Compassion-Focused Therapy (CFT), developed by Paul Gilbert, explicitly targets self-criticism and shame often underpinning anxiety and depression. CFT aims to nurture a sense of compassion for the self, helping individuals to understand that suffering (including shame) is an inevitable part of life, and that their minds can be trained to respond with kindness rather than self-blame. Techniques such as compassionate letter writing have been shown to significantly reduce self-criticism and shame. This shift from self-criticism to self-kindness is crucial, as shame often amplifies the inner critic.

• Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): CBT helps individuals identify and challenge the negative thoughts and beliefs that fuel their sense of shame. By restructuring shame-based cognitions, clients can begin to see their perceived flaws not as inherent defects but as manageable aspects of their experience. ACT, a ‘third wave’ CBT, encourages individuals to accept their feelings, including shame, without judgment, while committing to actions aligned with their values. This approach helps individuals create distance from their shame, enabling them to respond with self-compassion rather than being overwhelmed by it.

• Psychodynamic Therapy: Psychodynamic approaches delve into the developmental origins of shame, exploring how early experiences and attachment patterns contribute to its formation. By understanding the roots of shame and its connection to unconscious processes, individuals can gain insight and begin to heal deeply ingrained emotional wounds. This process often involves processing past traumas that may have initiated or solidified shame experiences.

• Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) and Trauma-Informed Approaches: Given the strong link between shame and trauma, trauma-sensitive therapies like EMDR are particularly effective. EMDR helps individuals process and integrate traumatic memories that contribute to feelings of shame, allowing for a more adaptive resolution of the distress. Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) also helps individuals understand how trauma affects their emotions and implement strategies for managing its effects, including shame.

• Narrative Approaches and Vulnerability: Brené Brown’s Shame Resilience Theory emphasizes four key components: recognizing shame triggers, developing critical awareness of shame (including its cultural function), reaching out to others, and speaking one’s story. Sharing one’s story with trusted individuals in a safe, empathetic environment is paramount, as empathy is considered the ‘antidote’ to shame. This act of vulnerability, though challenging, allows individuals to realize they are not alone in their experiences, dismantling shame’s isolating power. Group therapy settings can be particularly effective for this, fostering a sense of shared humanity and reducing the perception of being uniquely flawed.

The process of healing from shame is not linear and requires patience and persistence. It involves developing ‘shame resilience’—the ability to move through shame and emerge with increased authenticity and connection. The ultimate goal is to shift from a place of self-condemnation to one of radical self-acceptance, recognizing that being human inherently involves imperfections and struggles.

Many thanks to our sponsor Maggie who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Societal and Cultural Dimensions of Shame

Shame is not merely an individual psychological phenomenon; it is profoundly shaped by and, in turn, shapes societal and cultural contexts. The expression, experience, and perceived legitimacy of shame vary significantly across different cultures, underscoring its social construction. While shame appears to be a universal human emotion, an evolved adaptation to manage the costs of social devaluation, its specific manifestations are culturally mediated.

• Cross-Cultural Perspectives: Cultural values, particularly the emphasis on individualism versus collectivism, play a significant role in the salience and impact of shame. In collectivist cultures, such as many East Asian societies, there may be a greater emphasis on interdependence and maintaining harmonious group relations, which can make shame a powerful regulator of behavior. For instance, Japanese participants have been reported to experience negative engaging emotions like guilt and shame more intensely than Americans. Here, the focus might be on bringing dishonor to the family or community, rather than solely on individual transgression. Conversely, Western cultures, often characterized as more individualistic, tend to be perceived as ‘guilt cultures,’ where the focus is more on individual actions and accountability. However, it is crucial to avoid oversimplification, as shame and guilt often co-occur, and individual and cultural values can interact in complex ways. Research highlights that while withdrawal tendencies due to shame occur across cultures, externalizing and restorative tendencies can be culturally variable.

• Shame in Public Discourse and Policy: Shame is frequently weaponized in public discourse, used to enforce social norms, punish perceived transgressions, and maintain social order. Historically, public shaming rituals were common forms of social control. In contemporary society, this can be seen in online ‘cancel culture,’ where public condemnation can lead to widespread social and professional repercussions, often without due process or opportunities for repair. While some argue for the adaptive function of shame in regulating inappropriate behavior, excessive or unjustified shaming can be deeply destructive, leading to humiliation and fostering resentment rather than constructive change. Public health campaigns, for example, sometimes inadvertently employ shaming tactics, which can backfire by increasing stigma and driving individuals away from seeking help, particularly in areas like mental health and addiction.

• The Role of Media and Social Platforms: The digital age has amplified the potential for shame. Social media platforms, with their instantaneous and widespread dissemination of information, can turn private missteps into public spectacles, leading to intense and prolonged experiences of shame. The constant comparison fostered by curated online personas can also cultivate chronic feelings of inadequacy and ‘not-enoughness,’ exacerbating individual shame. This highlights a growing concern that digital interactions may inadvertently promote unhealthy shame by creating constant opportunities for perceived social devaluation and comparison.

• Collective Shame and Historical Trauma: Shame can also manifest at a collective level, where groups or nations grapple with the legacy of historical injustices or societal failures. This ‘collective shame’ can be a painful, yet potentially transformative, experience that prompts reconciliation, reparations, and societal change. However, it can also lead to denial, defensiveness, or a perpetuation of cycles of blame. Understanding these broader societal dynamics of shame is essential for addressing systemic issues and fostering more compassionate and just communities.

Ultimately, shame’s presence within societal structures necessitates a critical examination of how norms are established, how deviations are managed, and how empathy can be cultivated at a collective level. An informed society can choose to use shame constructively, as a motivator for ethical behavior and repair, rather than as a tool for dehumanization and exclusion.

Many thanks to our sponsor Maggie who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Conclusion

Shame is an exceptionally powerful and multifaceted emotion that permeates human experience at individual, relational, and societal levels. Distinct from guilt and embarrassment, shame is characterized by a global negative self-evaluation and the deeply painful belief that one is fundamentally flawed and unworthy of connection. Its origins are often traceable to early relational dynamics and developmental experiences, which can shape a propensity for toxic shame, a pervasive and destructive sense of unworthiness that contrasts sharply with the adaptive, growth-oriented nature of healthy shame.

The neurobiological underpinnings of shame reveal its deep roots in the brain’s threat and social evaluation systems, explaining the visceral and often paralyzing responses it evokes. Crucially, shame acts as an insidious barrier to authenticity and connection, thriving in silence and fostering isolation across diverse contexts, from mental health struggles and traumatic experiences to addiction recovery and the challenges faced by marginalized communities. It compels individuals to hide their true selves, thereby preventing the very empathy and understanding that are essential for healing.

However, the pervasive nature of shame does not equate to an inescapable fate. Contemporary psychological research and therapeutic practice offer robust pathways to identify, process, and overcome shame. Key among these are the cultivation of self-compassion, which directly counters the self-critical voice of shame, and the courageous embrace of vulnerability. Therapeutic modalities such as Compassion-Focused Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, psychodynamic approaches, and trauma-informed therapies like EMDR provide structured frameworks for deconstructing shame’s grip. The act of sharing one’s story in a safe and empathetic environment is consistently highlighted as a potent antidote, transforming isolation into connection and fostering shame resilience.

Societally, shame is a double-edged sword. While it can serve an adaptive function in regulating social behavior, its weaponization in public discourse, particularly in the digital age, can lead to severe and unjust consequences. A critical understanding of shame’s cultural variations is also essential, recognizing how different societies reinforce or mitigate its impact. Moving forward, it is imperative for individuals, communities, and institutions to cultivate environments of empathy, acceptance, and open dialogue, thereby transforming the silence that feeds shame into a space where authenticity and self-acceptance can flourish. Continued research into the neurobiology of shame, cross-cultural comparative studies, and the long-term efficacy of shame-focused interventions will further refine our understanding and enhance our capacity to alleviate this profound human suffering.

Many thanks to our sponsor Maggie who helped us prepare this research report.

References

Verywell Mind. (2023, June 28). Shame: Definition, Types, Effects, and Ways to Cope. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/what-does-it-mean-to-have-shame-7505322
Hejdenberg, M., & Andrews, B. (2011). Shame and Self-Esteem: A Meta-Analysis. PMC. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658826/
Psychology Today. (n.d.). Shame. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/shame
Sheikh, S. (2014, November). Cultural variations in shame’s responses: a dynamic perspective. PubMed. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25074027/
Person to Person Psychotherapy. (n.d.). How Shame Affects Relationships: Insights from Person to Person Psychotherapy. Retrieved from https://persontopersonpsychotherapy.com/blog/how-shame-affects-relationships/
Schore, A. N., & Schore, J. R. (2008, January). The impact of dissociation, shame, and guilt on interpersonal relationships in chronically traumatized individuals: a pilot study. PubMed. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18158586/
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Shame. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shame
Spokane Christian Counseling. (n.d.). Healthy Shame Vs. Toxic Shame. Retrieved from https://spokanechristiancounseling.com/healthy-shame-vs-toxic-shame/
The Trauma & Mental Health Report. (n.d.). Healing Shame by Practicing Self-Compassion. Retrieved from https://trauma.blog.yorku.ca/2022/10/healing-shame-by-practicing-self-compassion/
Psychology Tools. (n.d.). Shame. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytools.com/shame/
APA Dictionary of Psychology. (2018, April 19). Shame. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/shame
Navigating the Emotional Landscape of Relationships. (2025, January 27). Healthy Shame Vs. Toxic Shame. Retrieved from https://relationalhealing.com/healthy-shame-vs-toxic-shame/
First Step Men’s Therapy. (2023, February 5). Healthy Shame versus Toxic Shame. Retrieved from https://firststepmenstherapy.com/healthy-shame-vs-toxic-shame/
Grand Rising Behavioral Health. (2025, March 25). How to address feelings of guilt and shame in therapy. Retrieved from https://grandrisingbh.com/how-to-address-feelings-of-guilt-and-shame-in-therapy/
SeeMeScotland.org. (n.d.). What is Shame? | End Mental Health Stigma and Discrimination. Retrieved from https://www.seemescotland.org/stigma-discrimination/what-is-stigma/what-is-shame/
Psychologist Melbourne-Based Expert. (n.d.). Overcoming Shame: Insights from a Leading Psychologist Melbourne-Based Expert. Retrieved from https://www.psychologistmelbourne.com/overcoming-shame/
HER Health Collective. (n.d.). Healthy Shame vs. Toxic Shame. Retrieved from https://herhealthcollective.com/healthy-shame-vs-toxic-shame/
Dr Chris Irons. (2016, September 20). A Compassion Focused Therapy Approach to Shame. Retrieved from https://chrisirons.com/a-compassion-focused-therapy-approach-to-shame/
GoodTherapy.org. (2018, September 27). Healing from Shame, Therapy for…. Retrieved from https://www.goodtherapy.org/learn-about-therapy/issues/shame/therapy
NICABM. (n.d.). A 5-Step Process to Transform Shame with Self-Compassion [Infographic]. Retrieved from https://www.nicabm.com/article/transforming-shame-infographic/
Psychology Today. (2024, June 23). The Psychology of Embarrassment, Shame, and Guilt. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-squeaky-wheel/202406/the-psychology-of-embarrassment-shame-and-guilt
You Exec. (2019, August 28). Know the Difference between Shame, Guilt, Humiliation and Embarrassment. Retrieved from https://www.youexec.com/article/know-the-difference-between-shame-guilt-humiliation-and-embarrassment
The Collective. (2023, July 19). Overcoming Shame: Defeat Silence and Build Self-Compassion. Retrieved from https://thecollective.co.za/overcoming-shame/
Michl, P., Meindl, T., Engels, A. S., Hoffmann, R. J., Decker, M. R., & Reiser, M. (2014). Neurobiological underpinnings of shame and guilt: a pilot fMRI study. PMC. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4009772/
Roccas, S., Schwartz, S. H., & Sheikh, S. (2024, April 20). Group‐based shame, guilt, and regret across cultures. PMC. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11030999/
Birchwood Clinic. (n.d.). Vulnerability and Shame. Retrieved from https://birchwoodclinic.com/vulnerability-and-shame/
The Gottman Institute. (2025, May 19). How to Deal with Shame. Retrieved from https://www.gottman.com/blog/how-to-deal-with-shame/
Psychology Today Australia. (2019, July 18). Shame, Guilt, and Embarrassment | Psychology Today Australia. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/out-of-the-darkness/201907/shame-guilt-and-embarrassment
Mind. (n.d.). If it’s okay: tackling shame about mental health. Retrieved from https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/your-stories/if-its-ok/tackling-shame-about-mental-health/
Routledge. (n.d.). Cultural Perspectives on Shame: Unities and Diversities – 1st Edition – Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Cultural-Perspectives-on-Shame-Unities-and-Diversities/Mun/p/book/9780367468165
DMA – Discovery Mood & Anxiety Program. (n.d.). Four Ways Mental Health is Commonly Shamed – DMA – Discovery Mood & Anxiety Program. Retrieved from https://discoverymood.com/blog/four-ways-mental-health-commonly-shamed/
Psychology Today Ireland. (2023, May 23). An Evidence-Based Way of Overcoming Shame | Psychology Today Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/ie/blog/feeling-good/202305/an-evidence-based-way-of-overcoming-shame
NICABM. (n.d.). What is Shame (and Strategies to Overcome Shame) – NICABM. Retrieved from https://www.nicabm.com/article/neurobiology-of-shame/
OSF. (2024, October 31). PsyArXiv Preprints | Cross-cultural regularities and variability in the emotion of shame. Retrieved from https://osf.io/zpyrb/
Gu, J., & Strauss, C. (2024, October 23). Addressing Shame Through Self Compassion. PMC – PubMed Central. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506548/
Integrative Life Center. (2021, February 22). The Theory of Shame Resilience – Integrative Life Center. Retrieved from https://integrativelifecenter.com/the-theory-of-shame-resilience/
De Souza Santos, N. C. (2013, April). The Influence of Shame in Social Behavior. Semantic Scholar. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Influence-of-Shame-in-Social-Behavior-Santos/47d894b914856f6c827ac28b97d391038580000a
You Exec. (n.d.). What are the key differences between shame, guilt, humiliation, a. Retrieved from https://www.youexec.com/questions/what-are-the-key-differences-between-shame-guilt-humiliation-a
Frontiers. (n.d.). Guilt, shame, and embarrassment: similar or different emotions? A comparison between Italians and Americans – Frontiers. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1166348/full
ResearchGate. (n.d.). Toward a Deep Cultural Psychology of Shame – ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380757279_Toward_a_Deep_Cultural_Psychology_of_Shame
CPTSDfoundation.org. (2019, April 11). The Neuroscience of Shame | CPTSDfoundation.org. Retrieved from https://cptsdfoundation.org/2019/04/11/the-neuroscience-of-shame/
Lisa S. Larsen, PsyD. (2024, July 29). How Does Unhealthy Shame Affect Your Relationships? – Lisa S. Larsen, PsyD. Retrieved from https://www.lisaslarsenpsyd.com/blog/how-does-unhealthy-shame-affect-your-relationships
Positive Psychology. (2017, June 14). Shame Resilience Theory: Advice From Brené Brown – Positive Psychology. Retrieved from https://positivepsychology.com/shame-resilience-theory/
Schomerus, G., & Corrigan, P. W. (2014). Shame, perceived knowledge and satisfaction associated with mental health as predictors of attitude patterns towards help-seeking. SpringerLink. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00406-014-0545-3
Psychology Today. (2024, January 16). Why Interpersonal Trauma Is More About Shame Than Fear | Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/healing-from-complex-trauma/202401/why-interpersonal-trauma-is-more-about-shame-than-fear
Lundbeck. (2021, October 4). No shame in mental ill-health | Progress In Mind – Lundbeck. Retrieved from https://www.progressinmind.com/no-shame-in-mental-ill-health/
Pathways to Wellness: Insights from Francesca Wehr, LCSW Mental Health Counseling. (2024, February 20). Embracing Vulnerability: A Look at Brené Brown’s Shame Resilience Theory. Retrieved from https://www.francescawlcsv.com/post/embracing-vulnerability-a-look-at-bren%C3%A9-browns-shame-resilience-theory
Synergetic Play Therapy Institute. (2022, March 4). The Brain on Shame – Synergetic Play Therapy Institute. Retrieved from https://synergeticplaytherapy.com/the-brain-on-shame/
Neuroscience News. (2018, September 11). The Universality of Shame – Neuroscience News. Retrieved from https://neurosciencenews.com/universality-shame-9844/
+ProActive Approaches. (n.d.). The Power of Vulnerability and Shame Resilience in Education – +ProActive Approaches. Retrieved from https://proactiveapproaches.com/the-power-of-vulnerability-and-shame-resilience-in-education/